PQ 230
230. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 100 of 24 May 2017, if his attention has been drawn to the fact that a bank (details supplied) appears to have changed its interpretation of IAS 39, a standard which was heavily criticised during the recent bank inquiry but was nevertheless used by to hide losses in the past; if the bank has since corrected its interpretation of IAS 39 in order that in the forthcoming prospectus the bank will never value assets at above the value the bank expects to recover; the date the bank altered its views on IAS 39; if his attention has been further drawn to the fact that similar attempts by a bank (details supplied) to exploit IAS 39 resulted in a lengthy court battle which cost the bank £100 million in legal fees and resulted in the bank paying substantial compensation to shareholders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26922/17]
Introduced
20 June 2017
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 June 2017
Summary
230. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 100 of 24 May 2017, if his attention has been drawn to the fact that a bank (details supplied) appears to have changed its interpretation of IAS 39, a standard which was heavily criticised during the recent bank inquiry but was nevertheless used by to hide losses in the past; if the bank has since corrected its interpretation of IAS 39 in order that in the forthcoming prospectus the bank will never value assets at above the value the bank expects to recover; the date the bank altered its views on IAS 39; if his attention has been further drawn to the fact that similar attempts by a bank (details supplied) to exploit IAS 39 resulted in a lengthy court battle which cost the bank £100 million in legal fees and resulted in the bank paying substantial compensation to shareholders; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26922/17]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Banking Operations
Banking Operations
xml · EN · 20 June 2017
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2017-06-20/230/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2017-06-20/pq_230