339 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) with five children, who has been receiving family income supplement for over two years and whose spouse has been unemployed for over three years, is not entitled to back to school allowance in respect of the relevant children; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3314/11]

Summary

339 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) with five children, who has been receiving family income supplement for over two years and whose spouse has been unemployed for over three years, is not entitled to back to school allowance in respect of the relevant children; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3314/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 25 January 2011

   Social Welfare Benefits

   339 Deputy James Bannon asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person (details supplied) with five children, who has been receiving family income supplement for over two years and whose spouse has been unemployed for over three years, is not entitled to back to school allowance in respect of the relevant children; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [3314/11]

   Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Social Welfare Benefits

  xml · EN · 25 January 2011

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• James Bannon · Asking member
• Minister for Family · Minister for Family · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.