PQ 237
334 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason, in view of his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 197 of 1 October 2008, the regional inspector dealt with the imposition of the penalty at local level in the first instance, before it became necessary to go to appeal; the person who attended the appeal in respect of the Galway office and their costs; the cost of the venue and the appeals officers’ costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34129/08]
Introduced
8 October 2008
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
8 October 2008
Summary
334 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason, in view of his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 197 of 1 October 2008, the regional inspector dealt with the imposition of the penalty at local level in the first instance, before it became necessary to go to appeal; the person who attended the appeal in respect of the Galway office and their costs; the cost of the venue and the appeals officers’ costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34129/08]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Agriculture Appeals Office.
Agriculture Appeals Office.
xml · EN · 8 October 2008
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2008-10-08/237/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2008-10-08/pq_237