PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 237

334 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason, in view of his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 197 of 1 October 2008, the regional inspector dealt with the imposition of the penalty at local level in the first instance, before it became necessary to go to appeal; the person who attended the appeal in respect of the Galway office and their costs; the cost of the venue and the appeals officers’ costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34129/08]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

8 October 2008

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

8 October 2008

Summary

334 Deputy Ulick Burke asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food the reason, in view of his reply to Parliamentary Question No. 197 of 1 October 2008, the regional inspector dealt with the imposition of the penalty at local level in the first instance, before it became necessary to go to appeal; the person who attended the appeal in respect of the Galway office and their costs; the cost of the venue and the appeals officers’ costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [34129/08]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Agriculture Appeals Office.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.