237. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 60 of 26 January 2017 his views on whether the ECB could clarify more clearly its policy of Article 28 Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, in particular, if a member of the ECB commits a criminal offence the circumstances in which the ECB could rely on Article 28 Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 to dismiss an investigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10262/17]

Summary

237. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 60 of 26 January 2017 his views on whether the ECB could clarify more clearly its policy of Article 28 Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, in particular, if a member of the ECB commits a criminal offence the circumstances in which the ECB could rely on Article 28 Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 to dismiss an investigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10262/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 28 February 2017

   Banking Sector Regulation

   237. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 60 of 26 January 2017 his views on whether the ECB could clarify more clearly its policy of Article 28 Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013, in particular, if a member of the ECB commits a criminal offence the circumstances in which the ECB could rely on Article 28 Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 to dismiss an investigation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [10262/17]

   Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Banking Sector Regulation

  xml · EN · 28 February 2017

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• Murphy, Catherine. · Asking member
• Finance · Finance · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.