Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 239

248 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 180 of 17 May 2005 and 221 and 222 of 24 May 2005, when the company entered into non-binding heads of agreement with the consortium; the terms of the said agreement; the lands that were included or referred to as being the subject of said agreement giving details of area and location; the price or indicative value mentioned in respect of said lands; the details of the consortium involved; the explanation given for the fact that the company only sought ministerial approval for the arrangement after the heads of agreement had been completed and the matter had been raised in Dáil Éireann; the explanation given for the fact that the company had dealt exclusively with one private consortium concerning this matter and had failed to give any opportunity to others to tender or to be considered for any such arrangement; and the further or complementary commercial development that was agreed in the arrangement with the private consortium, apart from the national conference centre. [18317/05]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

31 May 2005

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

31 May 2005

Summary

248 Mr. J. O’Keeffe asked the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources further to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 180 of 17 May 2005 and 221 and 222 of 24 May 2005, when the company entered into non-binding heads of agreement with the consortium; the terms of the said agreement; the lands that were included or referred to as being the subject of said agreement giving details of area and location; the price or indicative value mentioned in respect of said lands; the details of the consortium involved; the explanation given for the fact that the company only sought ministerial approval for the arrangement after the heads of agreement had been completed and the matter had been raised in Dáil Éireann; the explanation given for the fact that the company had dealt exclusively with one private consortium concerning this matter and had failed to give any opportunity to others to tender or to be considered for any such arrangement; and the further or complementary commercial development that was agreed in the arrangement with the private consortium, apart from the national conference centre. [18317/05]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Correspondence.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.