PQ 24
128 Ms McManus asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if a submission has been received on the extent of the current risk to patients in view of the fact that for animals there is full protection from malpractice in the pharmaceutical sector while for humans there is not, and that there is no statutory fitness to practise or fitness to operate legislation on pharmacy; the steps she intends to take to protect patients and within what timeframe; if she can be held liable in any claims arising from malpractice in this area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3280/06]
Introduced
31 January 2006
Last action
—
Status
oral
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
31 January 2006
Summary
128 Ms McManus asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if a submission has been received on the extent of the current risk to patients in view of the fact that for animals there is full protection from malpractice in the pharmaceutical sector while for humans there is not, and that there is no statutory fitness to practise or fitness to operate legislation on pharmacy; the steps she intends to take to protect patients and within what timeframe; if she can be held liable in any claims arising from malpractice in this area; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [3280/06]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Pharmacy Regulations.
Pharmacy Regulations.
xml · EN · 31 January 2006
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2006-01-31/24/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2006-01-31/pq_24