PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 244

271 Deputy Maureen O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 290 of 10 May 2011, the number of clients arrested and or convicted for soliciting under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences Act) 1983; the number of pimps and prostitutes arrested, charged or convicted under the above Act; and if he will indicate the location of the arrests and charges. [12485/11]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 May 2011

Last action

24 May 2011 · Crime Levels

Status

written

Sponsors

O'Sullivan, Maureen.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

24 May 2011

Summary

271 Deputy Maureen O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 290 of 10 May 2011, the number of clients arrested and or convicted for soliciting under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences Act) 1983; the number of pimps and prostitutes arrested, charged or convicted under the above Act; and if he will indicate the location of the arrests and charges. [12485/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 May 2011

    Crime Levels

    271 Deputy Maureen O’Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 290 of 10 May 2011, the number of clients arrested and or convicted for soliciting under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences Act) 1983; the number of pimps and prostitutes arrested, charged or convicted under the above Act; and if he will indicate the location of the arrests and charges. [12485/11]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

  • O'Sullivan, Maureen. · Asking member
  • Minister for Justice and Equality · Minister for Justice and Equality · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.