245. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Skills if his attention has been drawn to the fact that there is an anomaly between eligibility criteria for progression routes in the PAC system when applying for higher diploma programmes as compared to the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection back to education system in respect of progression eligibility criteria; the steps that have been taken to address this inequality; the way in which he is advising persons when recruiting them to progression courses whilst still in their training programmes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29704/18]

Summary

245. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Education and Skills if his attention has been drawn to the fact that there is an anomaly between eligibility criteria for progression routes in the PAC system when applying for higher diploma programmes as compared to the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection back to education system in respect of progression eligibility criteria; the steps that have been taken to address this inequality; the way in which he is advising persons when recruiting them to progression courses whilst still in their training programmes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [29704/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Further Education and Training Programmes Eligibility

  xml · EN · 4 July 2018

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.