PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 247

247. Deputy Catherine Martin asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government the reason for his apparent intention not to provide for public participation in his plan to exempt large-scale peat extraction from the requirement to obtain planning permission; and the way in which this decision not to consult the public is consistent with Ireland's obligations under Article 8 of the Aarhus Convention. [25798/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

30 May 2017

Last action

30 May 2017 · Planning Issues

Status

written

Sponsors

Martin, Catherine.

Subjects

Housing

Source updated

30 May 2017

Housing

Summary

247. Deputy Catherine Martin asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government the reason for his apparent intention not to provide for public participation in his plan to exempt large-scale peat extraction from the requirement to obtain planning permission; and the way in which this decision not to consult the public is consistent with Ireland's obligations under Article 8 of the Aarhus Convention. [25798/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 30 May 2017

    Planning Issues

    247. Deputy Catherine Martin asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government the reason for his apparent intention not to provide for public participation in his plan to exempt large-scale peat extraction from the requirement to obtain planning permission; and the way in which this decision not to consult the public is consistent with Ireland's obligations under Article 8 of the Aarhus Convention. [25798/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Planning Issues

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.