PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 248

248. Deputy Jonathan O'Brien asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 348 of 15 April 2014, if she will be reviewing policies regarding the domiciliary care allowance in view of the High Court judgment referred to in the previous parliamentary question; if her Department will be contacting persons who were unsuccessful in their application, and notifying them of the ability to reapply; the number it will be contacting; the timeframe for same; the number of persons her Department has contacted notifying them that they could re-apply; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [13343/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

31 March 2015

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

31 March 2015

Summary

248. Deputy Jonathan O'Brien asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 348 of 15 April 2014, if she will be reviewing policies regarding the domiciliary care allowance in view of the High Court judgment referred to in the previous parliamentary question; if her Department will be contacting persons who were unsuccessful in their application, and notifying them of the ability to reapply; the number it will be contacting; the timeframe for same; the number of persons her Department has contacted notifying them that they could re-apply; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [13343/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Domiciliary Care Allowance Eligibility

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.