Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 252

252. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the reason the number of persons participating on the community return programme has declined since 2014; his plans to carry out an independent evaluation of the programme; and if the criteria will be reviewed with a view to extending access to the programme. [25250/19]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

18 June 2019

Last action

18 June 2019 · Community Return Programme

Status

written

Sponsors

Maureen O'Sullivan

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

18 June 2019

Summary

252. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the reason the number of persons participating on the community return programme has declined since 2014; his plans to carry out an independent evaluation of the programme; and if the criteria will be reviewed with a view to extending access to the programme. [25250/19]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 18 June 2019

    Community Return Programme

    252. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the reason the number of persons participating on the community return programme has declined since 2014; his plans to carry out an independent evaluation of the programme; and if the criteria will be reviewed with a view to extending access to the programme. [25250/19]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Community Return Programme

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.