Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 2521

2521. Deputy Cathal Crowe asked the Minister for Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht if he will review the eligibility criteria and terminology used in Departmental funding schemes, such as the Local Enhancement Programme and the Community Recognition Fund; if he is aware of concerns raised by long-established grassroots organisations, such as an organisation (details supplied) regarding the explicit naming of newer models like "Women’s Sheds" and "She Sheds" in application documentation, which can inadvertently give the perception that traditional, registered charitable women’s organisations are excluded or overlooked; if he will take steps to ensure that funding criteria are worded explicitly to ensure fair, equal, and equitable access for all established women’s community organisations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43265/26]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

9 June 2026

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

9 June 2026

Summary

2521. Deputy Cathal Crowe asked the Minister for Rural and Community Development and the Gaeltacht if he will review the eligibility criteria and terminology used in Departmental funding schemes, such as the Local Enhancement Programme and the Community Recognition Fund; if he is aware of concerns raised by long-established grassroots organisations, such as an organisation (details supplied) regarding the explicit naming of newer models like "Women’s Sheds" and "She Sheds" in application documentation, which can inadvertently give the perception that traditional, registered charitable women’s organisations are excluded or overlooked; if he will take steps to ensure that funding criteria are worded explicitly to ensure fair, equal, and equitable access for all established women’s community organisations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43265/26]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Schemes

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.