243 Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform in view of the fact that there is currently no pension solvency protection for workers, if there is a possibility that responsibility for pension deficits will be passed to the new employers in charge of State assets — leaving them with the decision on whether or not to make up the shortfall or cut the benefits of the members; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26896/12]

Summary

243 Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform in view of the fact that there is currently no pension solvency protection for workers, if there is a possibility that responsibility for pension deficits will be passed to the new employers in charge of State assets — leaving them with the decision on whether or not to make up the shortfall or cut the benefits of the members; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26896/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 6 June 2012

   Pension Provisions

   243 Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform in view of the fact that there is currently no pension solvency protection for workers, if there is a possibility that responsibility for pension deficits will be passed to the new employers in charge of State assets — leaving them with the decision on whether or not to make up the shortfall or cut the benefits of the members; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26896/12]

   Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Pension Provisions

  xml · EN · 6 June 2012

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• Flanagan, Terence. · Asking member
• Minister for Expenditure · Minister for Expenditure · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.