PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 254

298 Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the reason two separate Civil Service mileage rates exist for each engine size, one rate for the first 6,437 km and then a second rate that is almost half that first rate for each class for each kilometre over 6,437 km; the reason these specific kilometre point scales were chosen; the savings that would accrue on 2011 expenditure of the rate was either standardised to the lower rate, or standardised to an equivalent of the mean of the two rates; the number of total kilometres accrued in the Civil Service in 2011 above the 6,437 km rate; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9851/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 February 2012

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 February 2012

Summary

298 Deputy Kevin Humphreys asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the reason two separate Civil Service mileage rates exist for each engine size, one rate for the first 6,437 km and then a second rate that is almost half that first rate for each class for each kilometre over 6,437 km; the reason these specific kilometre point scales were chosen; the savings that would accrue on 2011 expenditure of the rate was either standardised to the lower rate, or standardised to an equivalent of the mean of the two rates; the number of total kilometres accrued in the Civil Service in 2011 above the 6,437 km rate; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [9851/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.