PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 264

264. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Social Protection if he will consider the way in which the contributory State pension is calculated to avoid those who had absences from the workforce for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to child rearing, are not inadvertently discriminated against due to the low yearly average rate, while those who only entered the workforce late and had a full ten year record receive a full pension due to their high yearly average; his views on whether this policy discriminates against those who took time out to rear their families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28129/16]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

4 October 2016

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

4 October 2016

Summary

264. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Social Protection if he will consider the way in which the contributory State pension is calculated to avoid those who had absences from the workforce for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to child rearing, are not inadvertently discriminated against due to the low yearly average rate, while those who only entered the workforce late and had a full ten year record receive a full pension due to their high yearly average; his views on whether this policy discriminates against those who took time out to rear their families; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28129/16]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

State Pension (Contributory) Eligibility

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.