PQ 265
265. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Finance if the territoriality principle obviates the need for the Revenue Commissioners to determine the allocation of assets used, functions performed and risks assumed by a non-resident company through its branch and through the other parts of the company, including intellectual property held by the company as a whole, for the purposes of determining the amount of such source income in line with the arm’s length principle; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1104/17]
Introduced
17 January 2017
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
17 January 2017
Summary
265. Deputy David Cullinane asked the Minister for Finance if the territoriality principle obviates the need for the Revenue Commissioners to determine the allocation of assets used, functions performed and risks assumed by a non-resident company through its branch and through the other parts of the company, including intellectual property held by the company as a whole, for the purposes of determining the amount of such source income in line with the arm’s length principle; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [1104/17]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Corporation Tax Regime
Corporation Tax Regime
xml · EN · 17 January 2017
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2017-01-17/265/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2017-01-17/pq_265