Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 265

265. Deputy Stephen Donnelly asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 363 of 26 February 2019, the details of interactions including dates, substance of advice and position taken by CervicalCheck between his Department and the organisation (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11495/19]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

12 March 2019

Last action

12 March 2019 · Cancer Screening Programmes

Status

written

Sponsors

Stephen Donnelly

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

12 March 2019

Summary

265. Deputy Stephen Donnelly asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 363 of 26 February 2019, the details of interactions including dates, substance of advice and position taken by CervicalCheck between his Department and the organisation (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11495/19]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 March 2019

    Cancer Screening Programmes

    265. Deputy Stephen Donnelly asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 363 of 26 February 2019, the details of interactions including dates, substance of advice and position taken by CervicalCheck between his Department and the organisation (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11495/19]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Cancer Screening Programmes

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.