266. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Education and Skills the reason despite a High Court ruling against a university (details supplied) regarding the payment of enhanced redundancy, the university continues to force persons who had contracts of indefinite duration but who were made redundant to go to court to have their rights upheld on a case-by-case basis. [46480/13]

Summary

266. Deputy Charlie McConalogue asked the Minister for Education and Skills the reason despite a High Court ruling against a university (details supplied) regarding the payment of enhanced redundancy, the university continues to force persons who had contracts of indefinite duration but who were made redundant to go to court to have their rights upheld on a case-by-case basis. [46480/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Redundancy Payments

  xml · EN · 5 November 2013

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.