PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 267

319 Mr. Gormley asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if, in view of the fact that the US scientist invited to present the case against fluoridation has strongly criticised her Department for being unfamiliar with the relevant science and thus unable to answer the 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation as promised, and has further accused her Department of hiding behind anonymous postings on her Department’s website, her views on whether the policy is unsustainable and must be reversed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [5467/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 February 2006

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 February 2006

Summary

319 Mr. Gormley asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Health and Children if, in view of the fact that the US scientist invited to present the case against fluoridation has strongly criticised her Department for being unfamiliar with the relevant science and thus unable to answer the 50 reasons to oppose fluoridation as promised, and has further accused her Department of hiding behind anonymous postings on her Department’s website, her views on whether the policy is unsustainable and must be reversed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [5467/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Water Fluoridation.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.