PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 268

307 Deputy Alan Shatter asked the Minister for Justice and Law Reform the proposals detailed in the action plan prepared by him relating to his Department under the terms of the Croke Park agreement to bring about reform, efficiencies and financial savings in the justice and law reform area and the steps taken to date to agree implementation of what is proposed in the plan [39757/10]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

2 November 2010

Last action

2 November 2010 · Croke Park Agreement

Status

written

Sponsors

Alan Shatter

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 November 2010

Summary

307 Deputy Alan Shatter asked the Minister for Justice and Law Reform the proposals detailed in the action plan prepared by him relating to his Department under the terms of the Croke Park agreement to bring about reform, efficiencies and financial savings in the justice and law reform area and the steps taken to date to agree implementation of what is proposed in the plan [39757/10]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 November 2010

    Croke Park Agreement

    307 Deputy Alan Shatter asked the Minister for Justice and Law Reform the proposals detailed in the action plan prepared by him relating to his Department under the terms of the Croke Park agreement to bring about reform, efficiencies and financial savings in the justice and law reform area and the steps taken to date to agree implementation of what is proposed in the plan [39757/10]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Croke Park Agreement

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Alan Shatter · Asking member
  • Minister for Justice and Law Reform · Minister for Justice and Law Reform · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.