PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 27

74 Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform in his review of spending, if his attention has been drawn to the high cost of contract cleaners for the Department of Finance, at €203,556.00, and also for the Office of Public Works, at €704,918.90; if he has done a comparison on the amount it would cost to directly employ cleaners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11246/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

28 February 2012

Last action

28 February 2012 · Expenditure Reviews

Status

written

Sponsors

Boyd Barrett, Richard.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

28 February 2012

Summary

74 Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform in his review of spending, if his attention has been drawn to the high cost of contract cleaners for the Department of Finance, at €203,556.00, and also for the Office of Public Works, at €704,918.90; if he has done a comparison on the amount it would cost to directly employ cleaners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11246/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 28 February 2012

    Expenditure Reviews

    74 Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform in his review of spending, if his attention has been drawn to the high cost of contract cleaners for the Department of Finance, at €203,556.00, and also for the Office of Public Works, at €704,918.90; if he has done a comparison on the amount it would cost to directly employ cleaners; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [11246/12]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Expenditure Reviews

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.