Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 27

27. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether consideration should be given to diverting €1.5 billion of excess funds in the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund to develop the State’s infrastructure further to a report by his Department in advance of budget 2019. [43978/18]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

25 October 2018

Last action

25 October 2018 · Ireland Strategic Investment Fund Investments

Status

written

Sponsors

Joan Burton

Subjects

Budget

Source updated

25 October 2018

Budget

Summary

27. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether consideration should be given to diverting €1.5 billion of excess funds in the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund to develop the State’s infrastructure further to a report by his Department in advance of budget 2019. [43978/18]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 25 October 2018

    Ireland Strategic Investment Fund Investments

    27. Deputy Joan Burton asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether consideration should be given to diverting €1.5 billion of excess funds in the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund to develop the State’s infrastructure further to a report by his Department in advance of budget 2019. [43978/18]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Ireland Strategic Investment Fund Investments

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Joan Burton · Asking member
  • Finance · Finance · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.