Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 270

270. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Social Protection if her attention has been drawn to the anomaly that exists regarding correspondence or distance learning courses, the popularity of which has grown considerably, under which a person is not entitled to back to education payments because he or she is considered available for full-time employment but also not entitled to a jobseeker's payment when unable to secure employment because he or she is considered to be pursuing an educational course; if this will be reviewed urgently in view of the hardship that such a restrictive interpretation of the system is causing. [20327/14]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

6 May 2014

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

6 May 2014

Summary

270. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Social Protection if her attention has been drawn to the anomaly that exists regarding correspondence or distance learning courses, the popularity of which has grown considerably, under which a person is not entitled to back to education payments because he or she is considered available for full-time employment but also not entitled to a jobseeker's payment when unable to secure employment because he or she is considered to be pursuing an educational course; if this will be reviewed urgently in view of the hardship that such a restrictive interpretation of the system is causing. [20327/14]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Back to Education Allowance Eligibility

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.