PQ 270
270. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government if the national planning framework consultations will feed into the mid-term review of the 2016-20 capital plan; if the mid-term review of the plan will wait until the new national planning framework is finalised to be undertaken; if not, his views on whether large infrastructure projects, such as the M20 motorway or proposed metro north, will be planned for progression without regard to the master national planning framework; and his further views on whether this would mean that the national planning framework and the existing capital plan will not be joined up and will suffer from the same mistake as has been levelled at the national spatial strategy and the national development plans in previous periods. [8514/17]
Introduced
21 February 2017
Last action
21 February 2017 · National Planning Framework
Status
written
Sponsors
Cowen, Barry.
Subjects
Housing
Source updated
21 February 2017
Summary
270. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government if the national planning framework consultations will feed into the mid-term review of the 2016-20 capital plan; if the mid-term review of the plan will wait until the new national planning framework is finalised to be undertaken; if not, his views on whether large infrastructure projects, such as the M20 motorway or proposed metro north, will be planned for progression without regard to the master national planning framework; and his further views on whether this would mean that the national planning framework and the existing capital plan will not be joined up and will suffer from the same mistake as has been levelled at the national spatial strategy and the national development plans in previous periods. [8514/17]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
21 February 2017
National Planning Framework
270. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government if the national planning framework consultations will feed into the mid-term review of the 2016-20 capital plan; if the mid-term review of the plan will wait until the new national planning framework is finalised to be undertaken; if not, his views on whether large infrastructure projects, such as the M20 motorway or proposed metro north, will be planned for progression without regard to the master national planning framework; and his further views on whether this would mean that the national planning framework and the existing capital plan will not be joined up and will suffer from the same mistake as has been levelled at the national spatial strategy and the national development plans in previous periods. [8514/17]
Source: written
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
National Planning Framework
National Planning Framework
xml · EN · 21 February 2017
Sponsors
- Cowen, Barry. · Asking member
- Housing · Housing · Addressed to
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2017-02-21/270/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2017-02-21/pq_270
- ireland · q-2017-02-21-pq_270 · source updated 21 February 2017