PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 271

300 Mr. Connolly asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of persons with disabilities employed in his Department; the percentage of the total staff that this represents; the human resources policy of his Department with regard to the recruitment of persons with disabilities; the qualification criteria for persons with disabilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8896/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

7 March 2006

Last action

7 March 2006 · Departmental Staff.

Status

written

Sponsors

Paudge Connolly

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 March 2006

Summary

300 Mr. Connolly asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of persons with disabilities employed in his Department; the percentage of the total staff that this represents; the human resources policy of his Department with regard to the recruitment of persons with disabilities; the qualification criteria for persons with disabilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8896/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 7 March 2006

    Departmental Staff.

    300 Mr. Connolly asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the number of persons with disabilities employed in his Department; the percentage of the total staff that this represents; the human resources policy of his Department with regard to the recruitment of persons with disabilities; the qualification criteria for persons with disabilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8896/06]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Staff.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Paudge Connolly · Asking member
  • Minister for Foreign · Minister for Foreign · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.