271. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Education and Skills further to Parliamentary Question No. 181 of 30 April 2014, in view of the High Court judge stating in his judgment in the Ó Cuanacháin case that the court was in effect being asked about a claim into the future to decide that Model A as proposed by the State was not an appropriate primary educational provision, the reason he is now stating that the model terminology was primarily internal when it is clear from what the judge stated that a decision was being made in the case before the High Court on whether or not Model A was appropriate for educating some children with autism. [21478/14]

Summary

271. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Education and Skills further to Parliamentary Question No. 181 of 30 April 2014, in view of the High Court judge stating in his judgment in the Ó Cuanacháin case that the court was in effect being asked about a claim into the future to decide that Model A as proposed by the State was not an appropriate primary educational provision, the reason he is now stating that the model terminology was primarily internal when it is clear from what the judge stated that a decision was being made in the case before the High Court on whether or not Model A was appropriate for educating some children with autism. [21478/14]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Autism Support Services

  xml · EN · 13 May 2014

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.