Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 275

288 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm that two independent authoritative consultancy reports undertaken by a company (details supplied) in 1998 and 2000 stated explicitly and repeatedly that Irish administrative practices did not fulfil EU obligations, that is, EU Regulation 2064/97 had not been complied with; that subsequently an EU Audit in 2001 found system malpractice in respect of the requirement of EU Regulation 2064/97; that in 2002 the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment confirmed to the EU Commission that it had applied EU Regulation 2064/97 retrospectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26188/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

4 July 2006

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

4 July 2006

Summary

288 Mr. Deenihan asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm that two independent authoritative consultancy reports undertaken by a company (details supplied) in 1998 and 2000 stated explicitly and repeatedly that Irish administrative practices did not fulfil EU obligations, that is, EU Regulation 2064/97 had not been complied with; that subsequently an EU Audit in 2001 found system malpractice in respect of the requirement of EU Regulation 2064/97; that in 2002 the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment confirmed to the EU Commission that it had applied EU Regulation 2064/97 retrospectively; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [26188/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.