PQ 275
410 Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason, in the context of a person making an application for jobseeker’s allowance, that a person’s partner’s income is not reduced by the amount of mortgage that is being paid, together with VHI payments, travel expenses and other such expenses, whereby the failure to allow such expenses deprives people of application for jobseeker’s allowance, where it is properly due, since if such expenses were allowed, the level of household income available is negligible; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [6074/10]
Introduced
9 February 2010
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
9 February 2010
Summary
410 Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs the reason, in the context of a person making an application for jobseeker’s allowance, that a person’s partner’s income is not reduced by the amount of mortgage that is being paid, together with VHI payments, travel expenses and other such expenses, whereby the failure to allow such expenses deprives people of application for jobseeker’s allowance, where it is properly due, since if such expenses were allowed, the level of household income available is negligible; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [6074/10]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Social Welfare Code.
Social Welfare Code.
xml · EN · 9 February 2010
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2010-02-09/275/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2010-02-09/pq_275