277. Deputy John Brady asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person is no longer considered a child at 18 years of age when it comes to qualifying for child benefit yet they are considered a child at 18 years of age when it comes to payment for a qualified child; his plans to address this anomaly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25482/17]

Summary

277. Deputy John Brady asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person is no longer considered a child at 18 years of age when it comes to qualifying for child benefit yet they are considered a child at 18 years of age when it comes to payment for a qualified child; his plans to address this anomaly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25482/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

1. 30 May 2017

   Social Welfare Benefits Eligibility

   277. Deputy John Brady asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a person is no longer considered a child at 18 years of age when it comes to qualifying for child benefit yet they are considered a child at 18 years of age when it comes to payment for a qualified child; his plans to address this anomaly; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [25482/17]

   Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Social Welfare Benefits Eligibility

  xml · EN · 30 May 2017

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

• Brady, John. · Asking member
• Social · Social · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.