28. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 212 of 26 March 2014, the reason the Health Service Executive has been permitted to endorse the website of a private company regarding maternity services here (details supplied), which fails to mention the existence of publicly-funded evidence-based midwifery-led care and midwifery led units, and instead promotes the views of obstetricians with private practices, and which does not contribute to informed decision-making on behalf of pregnant women when it signally fails to conform to international research evidence on a range of issues such as pain management. [21141/14]

Summary

28. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 212 of 26 March 2014, the reason the Health Service Executive has been permitted to endorse the website of a private company regarding maternity services here (details supplied), which fails to mention the existence of publicly-funded evidence-based midwifery-led care and midwifery led units, and instead promotes the views of obstetricians with private practices, and which does not contribute to informed decision-making on behalf of pregnant women when it signally fails to conform to international research evidence on a range of issues such as pain management. [21141/14]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Health Services

  xml · EN · 14 May 2014

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.