PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 285

304 Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Defence the cost to his Department of sign replacement resulting from the requirement of the Department and all agencies and bodies under the Department’s remit to replace signs which were in place prior to March 2009 where the existing signs in Irish did not or would not meet the requirements in terms of Irish text by 2012. [7194/11]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

12 April 2011

Last action

12 April 2011 · Official Languages Act

Status

written

Sponsors

Mitchell, Olivia.

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

12 April 2011

Defence

Summary

304 Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Defence the cost to his Department of sign replacement resulting from the requirement of the Department and all agencies and bodies under the Department’s remit to replace signs which were in place prior to March 2009 where the existing signs in Irish did not or would not meet the requirements in terms of Irish text by 2012. [7194/11]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 April 2011

    Official Languages Act

    304 Deputy Olivia Mitchell asked the Minister for Defence the cost to his Department of sign replacement resulting from the requirement of the Department and all agencies and bodies under the Department’s remit to replace signs which were in place prior to March 2009 where the existing signs in Irish did not or would not meet the requirements in terms of Irish text by 2012. [7194/11]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Official Languages Act

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Mitchell, Olivia. · Asking member
  • Minister for Justice and Equality · Minister for Justice and Equality · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.