PQ 290
335 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress that has been made on the recommendation in the report of the task force on autism of October 2001 that her Department establish an independent review body, with parental representation, in keeping with the recommendations of the report of the planning group, A National Support Service for Special Education for Students with Disabilities of 2000, to intervene in cases when provision is disputed; that the appeals system endorse mediation as the preferred method of resolving disagreement or disputes between parents and statutory bodies and that, in the event of an appeal of a draft statement of need based on the multi-disciplinary assessment, the child remain in an interim placement pending the outcome of the appeal and that the model adopted by the Department of Education and Science be accessible, independent and speedy, operating within the maximum timeframes recommended in this report, that the members of the appeals board be independent and have the expertise in autistic spectrum disorder appropriate education; if such a recommendation has been carried out; if so, the extent to which; if not completed, when it will be completed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [32184/04]
Introduced
7 December 2004
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
7 December 2004
Summary
335 Ms Enright asked the Minister for Education and Science the progress that has been made on the recommendation in the report of the task force on autism of October 2001 that her Department establish an independent review body, with parental representation, in keeping with the recommendations of the report of the planning group, A National Support Service for Special Education for Students with Disabilities of 2000, to intervene in cases when provision is disputed; that the appeals system endorse mediation as the preferred method of resolving disagreement or disputes between parents and statutory bodies and that, in the event of an appeal of a draft statement of need based on the multi-disciplinary assessment, the child remain in an interim placement pending the outcome of the appeal and that the model adopted by the Department of Education and Science be accessible, independent and speedy, operating within the maximum timeframes recommended in this report, that the members of the appeals board be independent and have the expertise in autistic spectrum disorder appropriate education; if such a recommendation has been carried out; if so, the extent to which; if not completed, when it will be completed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [32184/04]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Special Educational Needs.
Special Educational Needs.
xml · EN · 7 December 2004
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2004-12-07/290/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2004-12-07/pq_290