Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 290

290. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 420 of 24 September 2013, in the case of a person (details supplied) wherein the fairness of the procedures followed in his case was again affirmed, notwithstanding the serious allegations raised by legal counsel on the person's behalf in the course of an appeal to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal of the subjectivity of issues raised and conclusions reached, the obvious inference in respect of natural justice and due process, if it is a cause for concern that the original deciding officer in respect of the application for asylum in this particular case was never known to have made a single decision in favour of an applicant, despite having examined more than 1,500 cases; if he will, therefore, review the entire case and revoke the previous decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43628/13]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

15 October 2013

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

15 October 2013

Summary

290. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 420 of 24 September 2013, in the case of a person (details supplied) wherein the fairness of the procedures followed in his case was again affirmed, notwithstanding the serious allegations raised by legal counsel on the person's behalf in the course of an appeal to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal of the subjectivity of issues raised and conclusions reached, the obvious inference in respect of natural justice and due process, if it is a cause for concern that the original deciding officer in respect of the application for asylum in this particular case was never known to have made a single decision in favour of an applicant, despite having examined more than 1,500 cases; if he will, therefore, review the entire case and revoke the previous decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [43628/13]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Deportation Orders Re-examination

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.