PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 290

290. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Finance his views on the fact that the uptake of the Living City initiative has been lower than anticipated or desired from a policy perspective; the reason for the low take up; his further views on the fact that claiming for the LCI is unnecessarily complicated and could be made more user friendly (details supplied); his further views on the fact that the public knowledge of the scheme is very low; and his views on whether more regeneration areas should be covered under the scheme. [27826/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

20 June 2017

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

20 June 2017

Summary

290. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Finance his views on the fact that the uptake of the Living City initiative has been lower than anticipated or desired from a policy perspective; the reason for the low take up; his further views on the fact that claiming for the LCI is unnecessarily complicated and could be made more user friendly (details supplied); his further views on the fact that the public knowledge of the scheme is very low; and his views on whether more regeneration areas should be covered under the scheme. [27826/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Living City Initiative

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.