PQ 290
290. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Finance his views on the fact that the uptake of the Living City initiative has been lower than anticipated or desired from a policy perspective; the reason for the low take up; his further views on the fact that claiming for the LCI is unnecessarily complicated and could be made more user friendly (details supplied); his further views on the fact that the public knowledge of the scheme is very low; and his views on whether more regeneration areas should be covered under the scheme. [27826/17]
Introduced
20 June 2017
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
20 June 2017
Summary
290. Deputy Barry Cowen asked the Minister for Finance his views on the fact that the uptake of the Living City initiative has been lower than anticipated or desired from a policy perspective; the reason for the low take up; his further views on the fact that claiming for the LCI is unnecessarily complicated and could be made more user friendly (details supplied); his further views on the fact that the public knowledge of the scheme is very low; and his views on whether more regeneration areas should be covered under the scheme. [27826/17]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Living City Initiative
Living City Initiative
xml · EN · 20 June 2017
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2017-06-20/290/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2017-06-20/pq_290