290. Deputy Duncan Smith asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the evidence that was considered, accepted and rejected including the reason for rejection by his Department in respect of each wild bird species that was listed for control in the extended declarations for protection of public health or safety and air safety; and the origin and age of all such evidence with regard to his decision on 30 April 2022 to extend, unaltered the State-wide 2021-2022 derogation declarations. [34524/22]

Summary

290. Deputy Duncan Smith asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the evidence that was considered, accepted and rejected including the reason for rejection by his Department in respect of each wild bird species that was listed for control in the extended declarations for protection of public health or safety and air safety; and the origin and age of all such evidence with regard to his decision on 30 April 2022 to extend, unaltered the State-wide 2021-2022 derogation declarations. [34524/22]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Wildlife Regulations

  xml · EN · 28 June 2022

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.