294. Deputy Duncan Smith asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage his views on whether there is an important, serious material difference between the legally impugned per expert legal advice as sourced by and provided to his Department (details supplied) with serious implications for communities severely impacted by high-density urban seagull colonies; if not, the reason the primary legislation and or other legal advice that he is relying on to support his reasoning and his continued signing into law of derogation declarations using the 1986 regulations. [34528/22]

Summary

294. Deputy Duncan Smith asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage his views on whether there is an important, serious material difference between the legally impugned per expert legal advice as sourced by and provided to his Department (details supplied) with serious implications for communities severely impacted by high-density urban seagull colonies; if not, the reason the primary legislation and or other legal advice that he is relying on to support his reasoning and his continued signing into law of derogation declarations using the 1986 regulations. [34528/22]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

• Wildlife Regulations

  xml · EN · 28 June 2022

  ViewDownloadOpen at official source

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.