PQ 298
350 Deputy Eamon Scanlon asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the reason a verbal and implied written commitment cannot be given to a company (details supplied) in County Sligo in relation to the reimbursement of design fees and the possible redistribution of topsoil on IDA property that was not honoured despite the fact that this company paid full market for the site and are providing 25 extra jobs at cost to the IDA or to the Irish tax payer. [30794/07]
Introduced
27 November 2007
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
27 November 2007
Summary
350 Deputy Eamon Scanlon asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the reason a verbal and implied written commitment cannot be given to a company (details supplied) in County Sligo in relation to the reimbursement of design fees and the possible redistribution of topsoil on IDA property that was not honoured despite the fact that this company paid full market for the site and are providing 25 extra jobs at cost to the IDA or to the Irish tax payer. [30794/07]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Industrial Development.
Industrial Development.
xml · EN · 27 November 2007
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2007-11-27/298/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2007-11-27/pq_298