PQ 3
3 Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment her views on the failure to comply with a Supreme Court order of 30 April 2009, which required that the report of the labour inspectorate of her Department into the activities of companies (details supplied) be sent to certain official and State bodies with prosecutorial responsibilities; if the reports have been furnished to any of these bodies; the action she proposes to take; and her views on the breach of legal EU guarantees involved and the hardship that ensued to the workers involved. [31844/09]
Introduced
17 September 2009
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
17 September 2009
Summary
3 Deputy Michael D. Higgins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment her views on the failure to comply with a Supreme Court order of 30 April 2009, which required that the report of the labour inspectorate of her Department into the activities of companies (details supplied) be sent to certain official and State bodies with prosecutorial responsibilities; if the reports have been furnished to any of these bodies; the action she proposes to take; and her views on the breach of legal EU guarantees involved and the hardship that ensued to the workers involved. [31844/09]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Employment Rights.
Employment Rights.
xml · EN · 17 September 2009
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2009-09-17/3/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2009-09-17/pq_3