Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 30

47 Deputy Liz McManus asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment her views on the recommendations of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programme regarding her Department and agencies under her remit; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [44602/09]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

2 December 2009

Last action

2 December 2009 · Departmental Expenditure.

Status

written

Sponsors

Liz McManus

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

2 December 2009

Summary

47 Deputy Liz McManus asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment her views on the recommendations of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programme regarding her Department and agencies under her remit; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [44602/09]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 December 2009

    Departmental Expenditure.

    47 Deputy Liz McManus asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment her views on the recommendations of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programme regarding her Department and agencies under her remit; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [44602/09]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Departmental Expenditure.

View fileDownload file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

  • Liz McManus · Asking member
  • Minister for Enterprise · Minister for Enterprise · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.