Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 311

311. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Defence his views, that a person (details supplied) in County Kildare has been unduly disadvantaged by virtue of section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923, given that the reduction in the person's disability pension now exceeds the amount of compensation awarded as a result of civil proceedings; that section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923 denotes that a compensation claim may be taken into consideration, but is not required to be taken into consideration; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40477/15]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

17 November 2015

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

17 November 2015

Summary

311. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Defence his views, that a person (details supplied) in County Kildare has been unduly disadvantaged by virtue of section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923, given that the reduction in the person's disability pension now exceeds the amount of compensation awarded as a result of civil proceedings; that section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923 denotes that a compensation claim may be taken into consideration, but is not required to be taken into consideration; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40477/15]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.