PQ 311
311. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Defence his views, that a person (details supplied) in County Kildare has been unduly disadvantaged by virtue of section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923, given that the reduction in the person's disability pension now exceeds the amount of compensation awarded as a result of civil proceedings; that section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923 denotes that a compensation claim may be taken into consideration, but is not required to be taken into consideration; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40477/15]
Introduced
17 November 2015
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
17 November 2015
Summary
311. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Defence his views, that a person (details supplied) in County Kildare has been unduly disadvantaged by virtue of section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923, given that the reduction in the person's disability pension now exceeds the amount of compensation awarded as a result of civil proceedings; that section 13(2) of the Army Pension Act 1923 denotes that a compensation claim may be taken into consideration, but is not required to be taken into consideration; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40477/15]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Defence Forces
Defence Forces
xml · EN · 17 November 2015
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2015-11-17/311/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2015-11-17/pq_311