PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · oral

PQ 33

33 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the steps, if any, he has taken to introduce an objectively based grading system for carcase classification; the countries he has visited to observe the successful workings of the system; when he will introduce this for utilisation at factory level; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5372/99]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

24 February 1999

Last action

24 February 1999 · Priority Questions. - Carcase Classification.

Status

oral

Sponsors

Penrose, Willie.

Subjects

Agriculture

Source updated

24 February 1999

Agriculture

Summary

33 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the steps, if any, he has taken to introduce an objectively based grading system for carcase classification; the countries he has visited to observe the successful workings of the system; when he will introduce this for utilisation at factory level; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5372/99]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 24 February 1999

    Priority Questions. - Carcase Classification.

    33 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the steps, if any, he has taken to introduce an objectively based grading system for carcase classification; the countries he has visited to observe the successful workings of the system; when he will introduce this for utilisation at factory level; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [5372/99]

    Source: oral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Priority Questions. - Carcase Classification.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Penrose, Willie. · Asking member
  • Minister for agriculture · Minister for agriculture · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.