PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 33

120 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment his views regarding the failure of a company (details supplied) to implement a Labour Court decision to allow staff to be represented by trade unions at a disciplinary hearing; if clear legal rights will be given to workers in such situations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4099/06]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

7 February 2006

Last action

7 February 2006 · Industrial Disputes.

Status

written

Sponsors

Penrose, Willie.

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

7 February 2006

Summary

120 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment his views regarding the failure of a company (details supplied) to implement a Labour Court decision to allow staff to be represented by trade unions at a disciplinary hearing; if clear legal rights will be given to workers in such situations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4099/06]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 7 February 2006

    Industrial Disputes.

    120 Mr. Penrose asked the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment his views regarding the failure of a company (details supplied) to implement a Labour Court decision to allow staff to be represented by trade unions at a disciplinary hearing; if clear legal rights will be given to workers in such situations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [4099/06]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Industrial Disputes.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Penrose, Willie. · Asking member
  • Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment · Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.