Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 3345

3345. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Health her views on the need to support persons with degenerative spondylosisthesis, DS; if her attention has been drawn to significant delays for persons who require consultation and treatment for cauda equina syndrome arising from DS in Dublin; if she accepts that the Northern Ireland Planned Healthcare Scheme is not appropriate for all such persons impacted by delays due to the cost of travel and 12-week wait for reimbursement; and her plans to ensure that the public healthcare system here is in a position to support persons with DS and related conditions in Dublin and more generally. [26976/26]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

14 April 2026

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

14 April 2026

Summary

3345. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Health her views on the need to support persons with degenerative spondylosisthesis, DS; if her attention has been drawn to significant delays for persons who require consultation and treatment for cauda equina syndrome arising from DS in Dublin; if she accepts that the Northern Ireland Planned Healthcare Scheme is not appropriate for all such persons impacted by delays due to the cost of travel and 12-week wait for reimbursement; and her plans to ensure that the public healthcare system here is in a position to support persons with DS and related conditions in Dublin and more generally. [26976/26]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Health Services

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.