PQ 338
338. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection if her attention has been drawn to the fact that there is an anomaly between eligibility criteria for progression routes in the postgraduate applications centre, PAC, system when applying for higher diploma programmes as compared to the back to education system; the steps which have been taken to address this inequality; the way in which she is advising persons; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [29703/18]
Introduced
4 July 2018
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
4 July 2018
Summary
338. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection if her attention has been drawn to the fact that there is an anomaly between eligibility criteria for progression routes in the postgraduate applications centre, PAC, system when applying for higher diploma programmes as compared to the back to education system; the steps which have been taken to address this inequality; the way in which she is advising persons; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [29703/18]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Back to Education Allowance Eligibility
Back to Education Allowance Eligibility
xml · EN · 4 July 2018
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2018-07-04/338/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2018-07-04/pq_338