PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 34

64 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the steps he has taken or proposes to take to confront the ever increasing challenge of organised criminal gangs; his views on the threat presented to society by such organisations; if he will ensure that murder, extortion, money laundering, racketeering, witness and jury intimidation is stamped out; if he will ensure that bail is not available in the future to members of such gangs when there is evidence to suggest that they have been involved in serious crime and that they are remanded in custody pending clearance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21541/09]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

27 May 2009

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

27 May 2009

Summary

64 Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the steps he has taken or proposes to take to confront the ever increasing challenge of organised criminal gangs; his views on the threat presented to society by such organisations; if he will ensure that murder, extortion, money laundering, racketeering, witness and jury intimidation is stamped out; if he will ensure that bail is not available in the future to members of such gangs when there is evidence to suggest that they have been involved in serious crime and that they are remanded in custody pending clearance; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [21541/09]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Gangland Crime.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.