PQ 34
34. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance the discretion, if any, the Revenue sheriff has when seizure and sale would involve the tools of trade; if consideration is given to the prospect of earnings in the future from these goods; if attachment orders are considered for potential as opposed to actual earnings; the way that is evaluated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50061/13]
Introduced
21 November 2013
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
21 November 2013
Summary
34. Deputy Catherine Murphy asked the Minister for Finance the discretion, if any, the Revenue sheriff has when seizure and sale would involve the tools of trade; if consideration is given to the prospect of earnings in the future from these goods; if attachment orders are considered for potential as opposed to actual earnings; the way that is evaluated; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50061/13]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Tax Compliance
Tax Compliance
xml · EN · 21 November 2013
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2013-11-21/34/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2013-11-21/pq_34