PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 345

339 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on whether the Social Welfare (Consolidation) Act, 2005 Paragraph 1, Part 2 discriminates against a married woman where she is working with her husband who is a sole trader and in that situation is unable to pay the relevant PRSI contribution required to qualify her for maternity benefit while if she was single and living with the sole trader but not married to him, she would be eligible to pay the relevant contribution and qualify for maternity benefit; if this clearly discriminates against a married woman in this case; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13553/07]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

5 April 2007

Last action

Status

written

Sponsors

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

5 April 2007

Summary

339 Mr. McCormack asked the Minister for Social and Family Affairs his views on whether the Social Welfare (Consolidation) Act, 2005 Paragraph 1, Part 2 discriminates against a married woman where she is working with her husband who is a sole trader and in that situation is unable to pay the relevant PRSI contribution required to qualify her for maternity benefit while if she was single and living with the sole trader but not married to him, she would be eligible to pay the relevant contribution and qualify for maternity benefit; if this clearly discriminates against a married woman in this case; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13553/07]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Social Welfare Code.

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

No sponsors or actors listed by the source.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.