PQ 35
35 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason a tender competition was held to appoint presenting officers to attend hearings of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal; the further reason existing civil service resources were not deployed to deal with outstanding cases; the budget for this project; the length of time this panel will last; the number of cases that it will deal with; if he is satisfied that this is a cost efficient way of the State being represented at hearings rather than using civil service resources; the reason this tender was not advertised on the public procurement e-tender site; if he is further satisfied that the Codes of Practice of the Commission for Public Appointments was fully adhered to; the breakdown of the expenses and fees paid to each member of the assessment board; the way these were calculated; if he will name the 42 successful applicants detailing if they are barristers, solicitor or legal graduates; if these persons will be accompanied to hearings of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal by officials of his Department or the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner; if he has consulted or will consult with the Revenue Commissioner or the Department of Social and Family Affairs on the PRSI and tax treatment of the successful applicants to ensure his Department complies with its various responsibilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14850/09]
Introduced
8 April 2009
Last action
—
Status
written
Sponsors
—
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
8 April 2009
Summary
35 Deputy Finian McGrath asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the reason a tender competition was held to appoint presenting officers to attend hearings of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal; the further reason existing civil service resources were not deployed to deal with outstanding cases; the budget for this project; the length of time this panel will last; the number of cases that it will deal with; if he is satisfied that this is a cost efficient way of the State being represented at hearings rather than using civil service resources; the reason this tender was not advertised on the public procurement e-tender site; if he is further satisfied that the Codes of Practice of the Commission for Public Appointments was fully adhered to; the breakdown of the expenses and fees paid to each member of the assessment board; the way these were calculated; if he will name the 42 successful applicants detailing if they are barristers, solicitor or legal graduates; if these persons will be accompanied to hearings of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal by officials of his Department or the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner; if he has consulted or will consult with the Revenue Commissioner or the Department of Social and Family Affairs on the PRSI and tax treatment of the successful applicants to ensure his Department complies with its various responsibilities; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [14850/09]
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
No timeline events have been ingested for this record yet.
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.
Documents
1 official file
Departmental Appointments.
Departmental Appointments.
xml · EN · 8 April 2009
Sponsors
No sponsors or actors listed by the source.
Related records
No cross-record relationships stored yet.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/question/2009-04-08/35/
- Open data entity: https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/question/2009-04-08/pq_35