PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 35

37 Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on revising the current ban on the commercial fishing of sea bass in Irish waters if research showed that stock levels were at a reasonable level; if he plans to commission research in order to assess stock levels at the present time; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23331/12]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

10 May 2012

Last action

10 May 2012 · Fisheries Protection

Status

written

Sponsors

Wallace, Mick.

Subjects

Agriculture

Source updated

10 May 2012

Agriculture

Summary

37 Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on revising the current ban on the commercial fishing of sea bass in Irish waters if research showed that stock levels were at a reasonable level; if he plans to commission research in order to assess stock levels at the present time; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23331/12]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 10 May 2012

    Fisheries Protection

    37 Deputy Mick Wallace asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on revising the current ban on the commercial fishing of sea bass in Irish waters if research showed that stock levels were at a reasonable level; if he plans to commission research in order to assess stock levels at the present time; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [23331/12]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Fisheries Protection

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

  • Wallace, Mick. · Asking member
  • Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine · Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine · Addressed to

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.