PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Ireland · Question · written

PQ 351

351. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Health his views on the significant number of parents of children with special needs that have had to take cases to the High Court due to failure in the provision of assessments of need by the Health Service Executive; his plans to alleviate the waiting lists for assessments of need for children with special needs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53084/17]

askedIreland· Dáil Éireann· EN

Introduced

12 December 2017

Last action

12 December 2017 · Disabilities Assessments

Status

written

Sponsors

Bobby Aylward

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

12 December 2017

Summary

351. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Health his views on the significant number of parents of children with special needs that have had to take cases to the High Court due to failure in the provision of assessments of need by the Health Service Executive; his plans to alleviate the waiting lists for assessments of need for children with special needs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53084/17]

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 12 December 2017

    Disabilities Assessments

    351. Deputy Bobby Aylward asked the Minister for Health his views on the significant number of parents of children with special needs that have had to take cases to the High Court due to failure in the provision of assessments of need by the Health Service Executive; his plans to alleviate the waiting lists for assessments of need for children with special needs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53084/17]

    Source: written

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Disabilities Assessments

View fileDownload file

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.